Vladimir Lenin has a significant place in the 20th century. Unfortunately, his name is associated with more negative attributes than favorable qualities. He was an intellectual with a powerful brain and he wrote many books and newspapers during his time in Russia. He ushered in what’s known as the Greek country but that state he created collapsed within 5 years of his death and Russians believe that Lenin led them up the garden path to a state that was tyrannical and had limited personal freedom.
Lenin remains a historic figure in Russia and his body on his passing was embalmed and kept at the mausoleum in Red Square. Any dignitary visiting Russia was dutifully taken to see the mausoleum of Lenin on Red Square Following the collapse of communism and the breakup of Russia to 18 states the realization dawned on the Russian people that Lenin had led them up the garden route. There were many who wanted the entire body from the mausoleum to be eliminated like Stalin. People might recollect that Stalin’s body was also kept from the mausoleum in Red Square and that of Lenin but after Nikita Khrushchev became Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party, the body was removed and is now buried in the crypt in the Kremlin wall.
The mausoleum of Lenin is no longer a place of pilgrimage for people who come to Moscow and the Russian government spends no money to keep the mausoleum. It’s preserved by the Communist Party of Russia using its own funds. It is a moot point how long the body will stay in Red Square because there are numerous requirements to remove the body from that point. There’s absolutely not any doubt that Lenin did electrify the world in 1917, in what’s called the October revolution. This revolution that was supposed to provide lots of hope to the Russian people, sadly, did precisely the opposite. The Russian people came under the jackboots of the Communist Party throughout the Secret police, the NKVD and people began to dread the Midnight knock.
Lenin was an intellectual, no one will deny that although his head was warped and there are a number of facts which can’t be condoned. There’s some evidence that when he was the dictator of Russia, he might have arranged the murder of Tsar Nicholas II and his kids in Siberia. The Tsar who had been a prisoner of the Communist Party was shot dead together with his family on the pretext or being shot for a family photograph. The house of Romanoff has been completed and lots of Russians even now shudder at this.
He’s the first man in history to have brought into effect the concentration camp. This is extremely sad as Russia has a fantastic heritage and certainly using a concentration camp isn’t is not something to be proud of.
Lenin wasn’t much worried about India and there isn’t any evidence he said about India anytime in any of his speeches or writings. For him, India was a nonexistent nation and he considered it to be a part of the British Empire. Lenin had no respect for some of the Indian leaders during his period such as Gandhi, Tilak, or Gokhale. This celebration is known to have been an anti-Nationalist party and throughout the famed Quit India Movement of 1942, Communist Party of India supported the British. This is a historic fact and the majority of the Greek leaders on leadership from Moscow supported the British rule in that time.Britain was an ally of Russia in the struggle against Nazi Germany and the Russian authorities had instructed the Communist Party of India not to make trouble for the British.
These facts of history can’t be brushed under the carpet. This party claims to be an intellectual celebration and contemplating Bengalis themselves to be more intellectual have voted them into power. The CPI program was simple – to create another state in India and hence very little development was completed. The purpose was to create a split in the country. I’ve already written Lenin was not interested in India or Indian Independence. There’s absolutely not any record that Lenin ever said that India should be a free nation. These details are from the history books. Even Stalin wasn’t interested in India before his death in 1953. He considered Indian leaders such as Gandhi and Nehru as the running dogs of British imperialism
The state made by Lenin had no permanence and over 5 to 6 years of his death, the Greek country created he collapsed like a pack of cards. Russian’s recognized that there was no personal liberty and the complete Russian was like a enormous concentration camp so well brought out by Boris Pasternak and Alexander Solzetsysian. They brought to light in their novels and books a state that’s built on sand and was bound to fall along with the Russian State constructed by Lenin collapsed. Lenin can’t have a permanent place in history because he was essentially a failure. The name of this great will elude him for all time to come
In India we have lopsided properties and when the BJP that came to power in Tripura and toppled two statues of Lenin there’s been a hue and cry like Lenin was very much part of the Indian mind. The actual fact is that he wasn’t interested in India. Yet it’s a matter of great regret that Lenin has been greater significance in India than in Russia. Lenin was certainly a historic figure and a significant figure of the 20 century but he falls in the same bracket as Hitler, Mussolini, and Tojo and That Isn’t a very happy thought